<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BOP Director&#8217;s Misrepresentation to Congress</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prisonnewsblog.com/2009/04/bop-directors-misrepresentation-to-congress/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prisonnewsblog.com/2009/04/bop-directors-misrepresentation-to-congress/</link>
	<description>Prison News and Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 19:56:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://prisonnewsblog.com/2009/04/bop-directors-misrepresentation-to-congress/comment-page-1/#comment-1569</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 19:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prisonnewsblog.com/?p=1531#comment-1569</guid>
		<description>It is a sad thing when, finally, the House and Senate pass a bill that represents a marked improvement for inmates of the Bureau of Prisons, and those changes go completely ignored by the BOP. 

Fostering family ties inside prison walls is important, and the Second Chance Act even allowed for much longer stays in halfway houses for federal inmates. The limitation now is up to one year. However, my observation is that the BOP has made no attempt to change their behaviors, only their stated policies. Just because they &quot;can&quot; grant more time in a halfway house, which means more time with family and more chances to truly re-enter society, does mean they &quot;must&quot;.

What better way to prevent recidivism than to give inmates more time of their sentence to spend back in the community and close to home? Why is the BOP so intent on keeping inmates behind the walls? Money, and the machine which keeps the budged bloated, is the only reason I can think of. Less inmates means smaller budgets and less employees of the BOP.

I can take a while and delve into the Correctional Officer&#039;s Unions, their lobby, and influence over the BOP, etc. but I don&#039;t feel this is the forum. The simple fact is that, even when Congress has made LAWS to make a change, the BOP is too autonomous to care or respect the law of the country that created it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a sad thing when, finally, the House and Senate pass a bill that represents a marked improvement for inmates of the Bureau of Prisons, and those changes go completely ignored by the BOP. </p>
<p>Fostering family ties inside prison walls is important, and the Second Chance Act even allowed for much longer stays in halfway houses for federal inmates. The limitation now is up to one year. However, my observation is that the BOP has made no attempt to change their behaviors, only their stated policies. Just because they &#8220;can&#8221; grant more time in a halfway house, which means more time with family and more chances to truly re-enter society, does mean they &#8220;must&#8221;.</p>
<p>What better way to prevent recidivism than to give inmates more time of their sentence to spend back in the community and close to home? Why is the BOP so intent on keeping inmates behind the walls? Money, and the machine which keeps the budged bloated, is the only reason I can think of. Less inmates means smaller budgets and less employees of the BOP.</p>
<p>I can take a while and delve into the Correctional Officer&#8217;s Unions, their lobby, and influence over the BOP, etc. but I don&#8217;t feel this is the forum. The simple fact is that, even when Congress has made LAWS to make a change, the BOP is too autonomous to care or respect the law of the country that created it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rose</title>
		<link>http://prisonnewsblog.com/2009/04/bop-directors-misrepresentation-to-congress/comment-page-1/#comment-359</link>
		<dc:creator>Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 14:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prisonnewsblog.com/?p=1531#comment-359</guid>
		<description>I am saddened by this. As the wife of someone waiting to be transferred I can not believe the restrictions you mention and how unnecessary they are. It&#039;s not like the BOP pays for the phone calls nor do visits cost them a dime. Currently, as my husband has been in the local county jail I speak to him nightly and visit twice weekly. Realizing the additional cost for both travel and phone when he&#039;s transferred this would probably be reduced anyway but I would much prefer that be our choice not the BOP. It&#039;s enough my husband&#039;s sentence could be much better served in the community rather than sitting at a camp but to know that I can&#039;t even see or speak to him according to when we decide is appalling. In your opinion, what is the best way to get our voices heard?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am saddened by this. As the wife of someone waiting to be transferred I can not believe the restrictions you mention and how unnecessary they are. It&#8217;s not like the BOP pays for the phone calls nor do visits cost them a dime. Currently, as my husband has been in the local county jail I speak to him nightly and visit twice weekly. Realizing the additional cost for both travel and phone when he&#8217;s transferred this would probably be reduced anyway but I would much prefer that be our choice not the BOP. It&#8217;s enough my husband&#8217;s sentence could be much better served in the community rather than sitting at a camp but to know that I can&#8217;t even see or speak to him according to when we decide is appalling. In your opinion, what is the best way to get our voices heard?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

