News FeedEliminate Prison Camps to Cut Domestic Spending
President Obama ought to call for the elimination of prison camps to cut unnecessary domestic spending. This type of expenditure should not continue, as prison camps do not contribute to making society safer. Indeed, prison administrators have classified all prisoners in prison camps as minimum-security offenders and require those men to serve time on their own honor. Physical boundaries do not restrain them. If the prisoners do not present a threat to society, they ought to pay their sanctions by contributing to society.
David Fathi wrote about our “dysfunctional criminal justice system” for the Huffington Post. He points out the depressing statistics with the United States incarcerating 762 residents out of every 100,000. This figure compares unfavorably to other countries like Canada, that incarcerates 116 residents out of every 100,000; Japan incarcerates 63 residents out of every 100,000. The United States, it seems, is becoming more of a prison nation.
In Professor Joan Petersilia’s book When Prisoners Come Home, she wrote that in 1970, America incarcerated a total of 196,000 prisoners. In The Second Chance Act, Congress reported that America now incarcerates more than 2.3 million people. Does America feel safer with this increase that exceeds 1,000 percent?
The idea of closing prison camps is not without support from professionals who know prisons best. Earlier in my prison journey I had an opportunity to interview Warden Dennis Luther. At the time, Mr. Luther was the longest tenured warden in the Bureau of Prisons. As I was interviewing Warden Luther in his office as preparations for my master’s thesis at Hofstra University, he told me that prison camps did not serve a useful purpose. Anyone serving time in a camp, Warden Luther said, ought to be on home confinement or in a community based correctional program. That way those minimum security prisoners could pay their own costs of confinement while simultaneously providing service to society.
I have been incarcerated for 22 years, the past six of which I’ve served in three separate federal prison camps. I have held job assignments that have placed me in society without supervision. One job assignment required that I drive on a public road at midnight without staff supervision. I don’t grasp the purpose of such unnecessary imprisonment.
President Obama has called for cuts to unnecessary spending projects. Taxpayers ought to question the hundreds of millions it costs each year to confine nonviolent and nonthreating offenders in minimum-security camps.
I SUPPORT………..
How can we help you Michael. It is insane that you are still incarcerated. I have a friend in prison in Mississippi. I was searching for help when I found PTO and that is how I found you. I am so very sorry for your pain. Tell me what to do and I will try for you. I can at least pray. Would that be alright with you?
Verna, if you have not already done so, you can help by calling and writing to your Senators and Congressmen and urge them to either support the bills currently on hold in the Judicial Committee, I mention two of these later, or to introduce bills that will change the way our justice system works. Federal parole must be re-instated but, to my knowledge, no bill has been introduced. You can help by supporting the many petitions that are available on various web sites supporting judicial reform. You mentioned PTO but If you are not familiar with other sites may I suggest change.org under the criminal justice cause. There are several very good petitions there. One supports HR 1475 which will re-instate the federal “good time” allowances allowing earlier releases. Another is in support of HR 1529 A Second Chance For First Time Non-Violent Federal Offenders. This bill provides a real “Second Chance” for ex-offenders to make a clean start. There are others but you get the idea. And one more, you can sty in touch with this blog. The insight that Michael has and his observations and ideas are worth paying attention. This post concerning the uselessness of the camps is s acse in point. To be assigned to a camp you must be considered no “Threat” to society, so…….if you are no threat what is the point of wasting the taxpayers money running these places when justice could be better served in a myriad of better ways.